[Small animal cardiopulmonary -resuscitation (CPR) in general practice]. / Kardiopulmonale Reanimation in der Kleintierpraxis.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) is the acute cessation of systemic perfusion and ventilation. It leads to a lack of tissue oxygen delivery and, if not addressed quickly, will inevitably cause death. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is the only available treatment for CPA and several opportunities exist to improve the veterinary team's resuscitation approach and optimize small animal CPR patient outcomes. In 2012, the Reassessment Campaign on Veterinary Resuscitation (RECOVER) initiative generated evidence-based clinical guidelines to form the basis for training and practice of CPR in dogs and cats. When employing an evidence-based, standardized approach to small animal CPR, return of spontaneous circulation can be achieved in up to 58% of patients and up to 7% of dogs and 19% of cats can be discharged from the veterinary hospital alive. Survival for dogs and cats that suffer CPA is best in patients that suffer a peri-anesthetic arrest, so high quality CPR in the anesthesia patient population is of utmost importance and expected to be the most rewarding. To ensure the best possible outcomes for any patient suffering from CPA and undergoing CPR, a comprehensive resuscitation strategy is necessary, that includes preventive and preparedness measures, basic life support (chest compressions and ventilation), advanced life support (optimization of the patient status by targeted drug therapy, cardiac rhythm monitoring, and defibrillation), and post-cardiac arrest critical care. This article summarizes the most important RECOVER CPR guidelines for the small animal practitioner.

INTRODUCTION: L'arrêt cardiopulmonaire (ACP) est l'arrêt soudain de la perfusion systémique et de la ventilation. Il entraîne, s'il n'est pas traité rapidement, un manque d'apport en oxygène aux tissus qui conduira inévitablement au décès du patient. La réanimation cardio-pulmonaire (RCP) est le seul traitement disponible pour l'ACP. Les compétences d'une équipe vétérinaire quant à la gestion d'un ACP peuvent être améliorées afin d'optimiser les chances de réussite. Des directives cliniques ont été établies par l'initiative RECOVER (Reassessment Campaign on Veterinary Resuscitation) suite à une étude approfondie de la littérature scientifique. Ces recommandations servent de base à la formation et à la pratique de la RCP canine et féline. L'utilisation d'une technique standardisée de la RCP chez le chien et le chat permet de rétablir une circulation spontanée chez 58% des patients et de faire sortir d'hospitalisation jusqu'à 7% des chiens et 19% des chats. Les patients qui subissent un ACP péri-anesthésique ont un meilleur taux de survie. Des efforts dans la pratique de la RCP pour les patients sous anesthésie sont donc de la plus haute importance, de meilleurs résultats étant attendus dans ce contexte. Il est nécessaire de mettre en place une stratégie de réanimation complète afin de garantir les meilleures chances de survie possibles à tout patient souffrant d'ACP et subissant une RCP. Cette dernière comprend des mesures de prévention et de préparation, des soins de réanimation de base (compressions thoraciques et ventilation), des soins de réanimation avancés (optimisation de l'état du patient par une pharmacothérapie ciblée, surveillance du rythme cardiaque et traitements anti-arythmiques) et des soins intensifs à mettre en place après la RCP. Cet article résume les principales lignes directrices des recommandations RECOVER qui peuvent être mises en pratique par un vétérinaire généraliste.

Surgical hand preparation in an equine hospital: Comparison of general practice with a standardised protocol and characterisation of the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus recovered.

Presurgical hand asepsis is part of the daily routine in veterinary medicine. Nevertheless, basic knowledge seems to be low, even among specialised veterinary surgeons. The major objectives of our study were to assess current habits for presurgical hand preparation (phase 1) among personnel in a veterinary hospital and their effectiveness in reducing bacteria from hands in comparison to a standardised protocol (phase 2). Assessment of individual habits focused on time for hand washing and disinfection, the amount of disinfectant used, and the usage of brushes. The standardised protocol defined hand washing for 1 min with liquid neutral soap without brushing and disinfection for 3 min. All participants (2 surgeons, 8 clinic members, 32 students) used Sterillium®. Total bacterial counts were determined before and after hand washing, after disinfection, and after surgery. Hands were immersed in 100 ml sterile sampling fluid for 1 min and samples were inoculated onto Columbia sheep blood agar using the spread-plate method. Bacterial colonies were manually counted. Glove perforation test was carried out at the end of the surgical procedure. Differences in the reduction of relative bacterial numbers between current habits and the standardised protocol were investigated using Mann-Whitney-Test. The relative increase in bacterial numbers as a function of operation time (≤60 min, >60 min) and glove perforation as well as the interaction of both was investigated by using ANOVA. Forty-six and 41 preparations were carried out during phase 1 and phase 2, respectively. Individual habits differed distinctly with regard to time (up to 8 min) and amount of disinfectant (up to 48 ml) used both between participants and between various applications of a respective participant. Comparison of current habits and the standardised protocol revealed that the duration of hand washing had no significant effect on reducing bacteria. Contrary, the reduction in bacterial numbers after disinfection by the standardised protocol was significantly higher (p<0.001) compared to routine every-day practice. With regard to disinfection efficacy, the standardised protocol completely eliminated individual effects. The mean reduction in phase 1 was 90.72% (LR = 3.23; right hand) and 89.97% (LR = 3.28; left hand) compared to 98.85% (LR = 3.29; right hand) and 98.92% (LR = 3.47; left hand) in phase 2. Eight participants (19%) carried MRSA (spa type t011, CC398) which is well established as a nosocomial pathogen in veterinary clinics. The isolates could further be assigned to a subpopulation which is particularly associated with equine clinics (mainly t011, ST398, gentamicin-resistant). Glove perforation occurred in 54% (surgeons) and 17% (assistants) of gloves, respectively, with a higher number in long-term invasive procedures. Overall, bacterial numbers on hands mainly increased over time, especially when glove perforation occurred. This was most distinct for glove perforations on the left hand and with longer operating times. Our results demonstrate that standardised protocols highly improve the efficacy of hand asepsis measures. Hence, guiding standardised protocols should be prerequisite to ensure state-of-the-art techniques which is essential for a successful infection control intervention.

Noise levels in an academic veterinary intensive care unit.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the noise levels in a veterinary Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and ascertain how they compare to current recommendations in the human literature. DESIGN: A Larson Davis SoundTrack LXT Sound Meter device measured noise levels in a veterinary ICU for 41 days. SETTING: Specialty referral academic small animal teaching hospital ICU. ANIMALS: Passive involvement of dogs and cats housed in the ICU during the study period of 41 days. INTERVENTIONS: No alterations to the hospital environment or patient care were made. MEASUREMENTS: A-weighted average (LAeq) and maximum decibel measurements (LFmax) were recorded. The data were analyzed to look for correlations in elevated noise levels with the number and type of patients hospitalized, the time of day, and whether it was a weekday or weekend. MAIN RESULTS: The average, median, and maximum decibel levels measured in our ICU were 76.97 dB(A), 76.13 dB(A), and 86.54 dB(A), respectively, for the duration of this study. The time frames of 6:00 am to 9:00 am and 6:00 pm to 9:00 pm were associated with higher decibel levels in this study. CONCLUSIONS: The noise levels recorded in this study exceed the World Health Organization recommendations for noise levels in hospital care settings and are higher than the previously reported elevated noise levels in 2 veterinary referral private practice ICUs. Increased noise levels in veterinary ICUs may have adverse effects on our veterinary patients and staff and warrant further investigation.

Frequency and classification of errors in laboratory medicine at a veterinary teaching hospital in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of laboratory data is of utmost importance. Data regarding laboratory error in human laboratories are often extrapolated into veterinary settings. One study investigated the rate and type of errors in a European commercial veterinary laboratory, but that data might not directly apply to an educational setting. OBJECTIVES: This study determined the frequency and type of errors in laboratory medicine at a veterinary teaching hospital. METHODS: Errors associated with clinical pathology samples were recorded over two 60-day periods. The first period included a time when new students and house officers started at the veterinary school. The second time period was 6 months later. The errors were assigned to categories, and the frequency of each was calculated. Sample hemolysis, icterus, and lipemia were evaluated separately using an automated index, as these conditions could be pathologic or the result of error. Frequencies of error and hemolysis, icterus, and lipemia were assessed between the groups. RESULTS: Total error rates were 4.7% and 3.5% for the first and second periods, respectively. The frequency of each error subclassification was similar to those observed in the veterinary and human literature, with preanalytic error predominating. Statistically significant differences in the overall error rate and percentage of preanalytic errors that occurred outside of and within the laboratory were observed comparing differences between the two periods. CONCLUSIONS: The overall error rate in this veterinary teaching hospital was slightly higher than that previously reported in other settings, although a proportion of errors was as expected. Areas needing improvement were identified, and strategies to reduce error could be developed.

Investigation of the Status Quo of Veterinary Point-of-Care Laboratories in Switzerland: Availability, Application, and Quality Management.

INTRODUCTION: The extent to which Swiss veterinary practitioners follow the guidelines for quality assurance of the American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology (ASVCP) for point-of-care (POC) testing is unknown. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the availability, application, and quality management of POC analyzers in Swiss veterinary practices/clinics. For this purpose, we created an online questionnaire on laboratory equipment, quality management, and biosafety, which all members of the Society of Swiss Veterinarians (GST) were invited to complete. In total, 192 clinics/practices participated, of which 69% had automated POC analyzers, mainly for clinical chemistry (99%) and/or hematology (86%). Sample analyses and equipment maintenance were mostly performed by veterinary technicians (81% and 68%, respectively). Reference intervals were adopted from manufacturers (80%) or literature (17%). The results showed that most participants perform basic internal quality control (chemistry: 75%; hematology: 86%), and many use at least two levels of quality control material (47%-48%). Controls are mostly run once a month (chemistry: 36%; hematology: 35%) or ≤4 times/year (36% and 25%). Only three clinics/practices reported participation in an external quality assessment program; comparative testing was more common (chemistry: 42%; hematology: 52%). Only one-quarter of the participants stated that they make use of the data generated through internal and external quality control measures. In conclusion, POC analyzers are widely available in Swiss veterinary clinics/practices, and internal quality control is performed to some extent. However, quality assessment and management and biosafety awareness and measures need to be improved, ideally with the support of clinical pathologists.

INTRODUCTION: On ignore dans quelle mesure les vétérinaires suisses respectent les directives d'assurance qualité de l'American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology (ASVCP) pour les tests au point de service (Point of Care, POC). Ainsi, l'objectif de cette étude était d'évaluer la disponibilité, l'application et la gestion de la qualité des analyseurs POC dans les cabinets/cliniques vétérinaires suisses. À cette fin, nous avons créé un questionnaire en ligne sur les équipements de laboratoire, la gestion de la qualité et la biosécurité que tous les membres de la Société suisse des vétérinaires (GST) ont été invités à remplir. Au total, 192 cliniques/cabinets ont participé, dont 69% avaient des analyseurs POC automatisés, principalement pour la chimie clinique (99%) et/ou l'hématologie (86%). Les analyses des échantillons et la maintenance de l>équipement ont été principalement effectuées par des assistant(e)s en médecine vétérinaires (81% et 68%, respectivement). Les intervalles de référence ont été fixés sur la base des indications des fabricants (80%) ou de la littérature (17%). Les résultats ont montré que la plupart des participants effectuent un contrôle de qualité interne de base (chimie: 75%; hématologie: 86%) et que beaucoup utilisent au moins deux niveaux de matériel de contrôle de la qualité (47% ­48%). Les contrôles sont principalement effectués une fois par mois (chimie: 36%; hématologie: 35%) ou ≤4 fois / an (36% et 25%). Seules trois cliniques/cabinets ont déclaré avoir participé à un programme externe d'évaluation de la qualité. Les tests comparatifs étaient plus courants (chimie: 42%; hématologie: 52%). Un quart seulement des participants ont déclaré utiliser les données générées par des mesures de contrôle de qualité internes et externes. En conclusion, les analyseurs POC sont largement disponibles dans les cliniques/cabinets vétérinaires suisses et le contrôle qualité interne est effectué dans une certaine mesure. Cependant, l'évaluation et la gestion de la qualité ainsi que la sensibilisation et les mesures en matière de biosécurité doivent être améliorées, idéalement avec le soutien de pathologistes cliniciens.

2020 AAHA Anesthesia and Monitoring Guidelines for Dogs and Cats.

Risk for complications and even death is inherent to anesthesia. However, the use of guidelines, checklists, and training can decrease the risk of anesthesia-related adverse events. These tools should be used not only during the time the patient is unconscious but also before and after this phase. The framework for safe anesthesia delivered as a continuum of care from home to hospital and back to home is presented in these guidelines. The critical importance of client communication and staff training have been highlighted. The role of perioperative analgesia, anxiolytics, and proper handling of fractious/fearful/aggressive patients as components of anesthetic safety are stressed. Anesthesia equipment selection and care is detailed. The objective of these guidelines is to make the anesthesia period as safe as possible for dogs and cats while providing a practical framework for delivering anesthesia care. To meet this goal, tables, algorithms, figures, and "tip" boxes with critical information are included in the manuscript and an in-depth online resource center is available at aaha.org/anesthesia.

Infection control practices employed within small animal veterinary practices-A systematic review.

Effective infection control (IC) provides a safe environment for staff, clients and animals of veterinary practices by reducing the risk of nosocomial and zoonotic infections, which are associated with increased hospital stays, costs, morbidity and mortality. An equally important issue arising from nosocomial infection is the loss of trust between the client and the veterinary practice that has potential negative impacts on the veterinary practice in terms of economic risk and the well-being of staff. Furthermore, an emerging and significant threat, in this context, is antimicrobial resistance. The aim of this systematic review was to critically review published reports that documented current IC practices and evaluated interventions to improve IC practices. A systematic literature search using ten databases to identify papers published over a 20-year period (February 1996 to February 2016) was conducted for studies that met the inclusion criteria. Included studies were assessed using the PRISMA and STROBE-Vet statements. A total of 14 of 1,615 identified studies met our inclusion criteria. Infection control practices included hand hygiene, sharps handling, environmental cleaning, personal protective equipment and personnel vaccination. Descriptive studies were the predominant research design for assessing IC compliance. Only three studies were interventions. Compliance with IC protocols was poor and only marginally increased with multimodal educational campaigns. There was significant variation in the implementation of IC by veterinary staff. Workplaces that had IC policies, management support and a staff member supporting their implementation were more likely to embrace good IC. Infection control data in veterinary practices were inconsistently reported and collected. Clearly defining IC and determining prevalence of these practices within the veterinary field is important given the limited research in this area. Further, developing and implementing educational campaigns for this sector is needed.

Reduced rates of antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus intermedius group and Escherichia coli isolated from diseased companion animals in an animal hospital after restriction of antimicrobial use.

The 2016 National Action Plan aims for reduction in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) to tetracyclines, third-generation cephalosporins, and fluoroquinolones in Escherichia coli isolates from livestock: to lower the tetracycline resistance of E. coli to 33% or less; to maintain the third-generation cephalosporin resistance of E. coli at the same level as in the other G7 countries as of 2020; and to maintain the fluoroquinolone resistance of E. coli at the same level as in the other G7 countries as of 2020. A relatively unexplored facet of reducing AMR is the impact of minimizing transmission of AMR strains by companion animals. In this study we compared AMR rates in Staphylococcus intermedius group (SIG) and E. coli isolated from diseased companion animals in an animal hospital before and after restriction of antimicrobial use. Our study spanned a 4.5-year period from 2014 to June 2018 during which antimicrobial use was restricted in 2016. During this period, abundance of methicillin-resistant SIG isolates from the hospital dropped from 41.5% to 9.3%, and that of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing E. coli isolates dropped from 29.5% to 9.5%. Tests for antimicrobial susceptibility revealed significantly reduced rates of AMR to enrofloxacin and levofloxacin in SIG isolates, and to cefazolin in E. coli isolates after antimicrobial use was restricted. Our observations suggest that restriction of antimicrobial use, especially that of third-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones, is an effective method for reducing AMR rates. These findings will be relevant in guiding antimicrobial restriction approaches in other animal hospitals and clinics.

Acinetobacter in veterinary medicine, with an emphasis on Acinetobacter baumannii.

Acinetobacter spp. are aerobic, rod-shaped, Gram-negative bacteria belonging to the Moraxellaceae family of the class Gammaproteobacteria and are considered ubiquitous organisms. Among them, Acinetobacter baumannii is the most clinically significant species with an extraordinary ability to accumulate antimicrobial resistance and to survive in the hospital environment. Recent reports indicate that A. baumannii has also evolved into a veterinary nosocomial pathogen. Although Acinetobacter spp. can be identified to species level using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF/MS) coupled with an updated database, molecular techniques are still necessary for genotyping and determination of clonal lineages. It appears that the majority of infections due to A. baumannii in veterinary medicine are nosocomial. Such isolates have been associated with several types of infection such as canine pyoderma, feline necrotizing fasciitis, urinary tract infection, equine thrombophlebitis and lower respiratory tract infection, foal sepsis, pneumonia in mink, and cutaneous lesions in hybrid falcons. Given the potential multidrug resistance of A. baumannii, treatment of diseased animals is often supportive and should preferably be based on in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing results. It should be noted that animal isolates show high genetic diversity and are in general distinct in their sequence types and resistance patterns from those found in humans. However, it cannot be excluded that animals may occasionally play a role as a reservoir of A. baumannii. Thus, it is of importance to implement infection control measures in veterinary hospitals to avoid nosocomial outbreaks with multidrug-resistant A. baumannii.

Noise levels in veterinary operating rooms and factors that contribute to their variations.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify noise levels in veterinary operating rooms (OR) and evaluate factors affecting them. STUDY DESIGN: Pilot study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Seventy-seven small-animal surgical procedures at the University of Florida College of Veterinary Medicine Small Animal Hospital. METHODS: A decibel-measuring device was used to measure mean A-weighted, median, and maximum decibel readings within the OR. The number of people present in the OR, the number of people scrubbed in, the surgery service, and whether or not music was playing were recorded. RESULTS: The mean, median, and maximum decibel levels for all surgeries were 71.7 A-weighted decibels [dB(A)], 69.4 dB(A), and 90.3 dB(A), respectively. Neurologic surgeries were associated with higher noise levels. OR with music playing were louder than those without music (P < .001). None of the other factors evaluated were associated with noise levels. CONCLUSION: Neurological surgeries and playing music in the OR were associated with higher noise levels. The average noise levels in our veterinary OR were high and exceeded World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first published study to quantify noise levels in a veterinary OR. Noise levels that exceed WHO recommended levels warrant additional investigation for potential side effects on surgical patients and OR staff.

Completeness of handwritten preanaesthetic records at two veterinary referral institutions.

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyse handwritten preanaesthetic records for completeness at two veterinary referral institutions: a university veterinary teaching hospital and a private veterinary referral hospital. To evaluate if emergency records were less complete compared with non-emergency records. Animal or Animal Population Two hundred and fifty preanaesthetic records at each referral institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Handwritten preanaesthetic records were analysed for completeness. Data was described as complete or incomplete. In order to be classified as complete information had to be present, legible and correct. Sections of the preanaesthetic record analysed included the date, anaesthetist, clinician, presenting problem, procedure, time food withheld, temperature, pulse rate (PR), respiratory rate (fR), American Society of Anesthesiologists-Physical Status Classification (ASA-PSC), premedication drug name, premedication drug dose, premedication route of administration, premedication time, effect of premedication, induction drug name, induction drug dose, induction time, induction quality, maintenance anaesthetic agent, endotracheal tube (ET) diameter, anaesthetic breathing system and monitoring equipment. RESULTS: At both referral institutions 250 records were analysed. Completeness of data was generally poor, however, several differences did exist. Completion rates were generally higher at the university veterinary teaching hospital. A mix of structured and unstructured (requiring free text) data fields were poorly complete. Emergency records were significantly less complete with respect to: Time food withheld (p = 0.006) and Temperature (p = 0.0275). CONCLUSIONS: Differences observed may be due to anaesthetic record design, anaesthetic caseload, case discussion, education or quality assurance programmes. Clinical relevance Increased emphasis on education and implementation of quality assurance programmes should be considered in order to improve completeness of preanaesthetic records.

Engineering controls in veterinary oncology: A survey of 148 ACVIM board-certified oncologists and environmental surveillance in 20 specialty hospitals.

Engineering controls (EC, facility and equipment barriers between hazards and people) are used to avoid exposure to chemotherapy drugs. In this study, American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine board-certified veterinary oncologists were surveyed about their use of containment primary EC (C-PEC) and supplemental EC (closed system transfer devices, CSTD). The survey was completed by 148 (38%) of practicing diplomates. All used EC. Both C-PEC and CSTD were used at 92% of hospitals; however, US Pharmacopoeial Convention Chapter <800> (USP <800>) standards were met at only 19% of hospitals and oncologists did not know the type of C-PEC at 18% of hospitals. Next, surface contamination and EC use were assessed with environmental surveillance for carboplatin, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine in 20 veterinary specialty hospitals using a commercially available kit. No contamination with carboplatin, doxorubicin, or vincristine was detected, however, there was contamination with cyclophosphamide at 4 hospitals. Based on this study, most veterinary oncologists use C-PEC and CSTD, but few meet USP <800> standards. Current measures appear effective for preventing contamination with IV drugs, but additional measures are needed for oral drugs.

Systems analysis of voluntary reported anaesthetic safety incidents occurring in a university teaching hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors contributing to the development of anaesthetic safety incidents. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, descriptive, voluntary reporting audit of safety incidents with subsequent systems analysis. ANIMALS: All animals anaesthetized in a multispecies veterinary teaching hospital from November 2014 to October 2016. METHODS: Peri-anaesthetic incidents that risked or caused unnecessary harm to an animal were reported by anaesthetists alongside animal morbidity and mortality data. A modified systems analysis framework was used to identify contributing factors from the following categories: Animal and Owner, Task and Technology, Individual, Team, Work Environmental, and Organizational and Management. The outcome was graded using a simple descriptive scale. Data were analysed using Pearson's Chi-Square test for association and univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Totally, 3379 anaesthetics were performed during the audit period. Of these, 174 incident reports were analysed, 163 of which impacted safe veterinary care and 26 incidents were considered to have had major or catastrophic outcomes. Incident outcome was believed to have been limited by anaesthetist intervention in 104 (63.8%) cases. Various factors were identified as: Individual in 123 (70.7%), Team in 108 (62.1%), Organizational and Management in 94 (54.0%), Task and Technology in 80 (46.0%), Work Environmental in 53 (30.5%) and Animal and Owner in 36 (20.7%) incidents. Individual factors were rarely seen in isolation. Significant associations were identified between Experience and Supervision, X2 (1, n=174)=54177, p=0.001, Failure to follow a standard operating procedure and Task Management, X2 (2, n=174)=11318, p=0.001, and Staffing and Poor Scheduling, X2 (1, n=174)=36742, p=0.001. Animal Condition [odds ratio (OR)=16210, 95% confidence interval (CI)=5573-47147)] and anaesthetist Decision Making (OR=3437, 95% CI=1184-9974) were risk factors for catastrophic and major outcomes. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Individual factors contribute to many safety incidents but tend to occur concurrently with other factors. Anaesthetist intervention limits the consequences of incidents for most animals.

Evaluation of a welfare assessment tool to examine practices for preventing, recognizing, and managing pain at companion-animal veterinary clinics.

Successful prevention, recognition, and treatment of pain are integral to ensuring veterinary patient welfare. A canine and feline welfare assessment tool, incorporating verbal interviews with veterinarians using open-ended questions, was developed to assess pain management practices that safeguard and improve patient welfare. The tool was evaluated in 30 companion- and mixed-animal veterinary clinics in Ontario in order to assess its reliability, feasibility, and validity, while also benchmarking current practices. Responses were analyzed according to a scoring scheme developed based on published literature and expert opinion. Based on weighted kappa statistics, interview scoring had substantial inter-observer (Kw = 0.83, 0.73) and near-perfect intra-observer (Kw = 0.92) agreement, which suggests that the tool reliably collects information about pain management practices. Interviews were completed at all recruited clinics, which indicates high feasibility for the methods. Validity could not be assessed, as participants were reluctant to share information about analgesic administration from their clinical records. Descriptive results indicated areas for which many veterinarians are acting in accordance with best practices for pain management, such as pre-emptive and post-surgical analgesia for ovariohysterectomy patients, and post-surgical care instructions. Areas that offer opportunity for enhancement were also highlighted, e.g., training veterinary staff to recognize signs of pain and duration of analgesia in ovariohysterectomy patients after discharge. Overall, based on this limited sample, most veterinarians appear to be effectively managing their patients' pain, although areas with opportunity for enhancement were also identified. Further research is needed to assess trends in a broader sample of participants.

Être en mesure de prévenir, reconnaitre, et traiter la douleur avec succès est essentiel pour assurer le bien-être des patients vétérinaires. Un outil d'évaluation du bien-être des chiens et des chats, incorporant une entrevue orale avec des vétérinaires avec des questions ouvertes, a été développé pour évaluer les pratiques de gestion de la douleur qui sauvegarde et améliore le bien-être des patients. L'outil a été évalué dans 30 cliniques vétérinaires pour animaux de compagnie et cliniques mixtes en Ontario afin de vérifier la fiabilité, la faisabilité, et la validité, tout en réalisant un étalonnage des pratiques actuelles. Les réponses ont été analysées selon un schéma de pointage basé sur la littérature publiée et l'opinion d'expert. Sur la base des statistiques kappa pondérées, les pointages des entrevues avaient un accord inter-observateur marqué (Kw = 0,83, 0,73) et un accord intra-observateur presque parfait (Kw = 0,92), ce qui suggère que l'outil a permis d'obtenir des informations fiables sur les pratiques de gestion de la douleur. Les entrevues ont été complétées dans toutes les cliniques recrutées, ce qui indiquait une excellente faisabilité pour les méthodes utilisées. La validité n'a pu être vérifiée car les participants étaient réfractaires à partager de l'information sur l'administration d'analgésique à partir de leurs dossiers médicaux. Les résultats indiquent que plusieurs vétérinaires agissent en concordance avec les bonnes pratiques de gestion de la douleur pour l'analgésie préventive et post-chirurgicale des patients subissant une ovariohystérectomie et les instructions pour les soins post-chirurgie. D'autres domaines ont été identifiés comme nécessitant des améliorations, e.g. former le personnel de la clinique à reconnaitre les signes de douleurs et la durée de l'analgésie chez les patients ayant eu une ovariohystérectomie après leur congé. De manière générale, sur la base de cet échantillonnage limité, la plupart des vétérinaires semble gérer la douleur de leurs patients de manière efficace, bien que des améliorations à faire aient été identifiées. De la recherche supplémentaire est requise pour évaluer les tendances dans un échantillonnage plus grand de participants.(Traduit par Docteur Serge Messier).

Comparison of an alcohol-based hand sanitation product with a traditional chlorhexidine hand scrub technique for hand hygiene preparation in an equine hospital.

AIMS: To investigate the efficacy of an alcohol gel-based hand antisepsis protocol compared with a traditional chlorhexidine-based protocol under conditions of routine clinical contamination, and following heavy faecal contamination. METHODS: Twelve adult participants were recruited and on four separate days completed a hand sanitation protocol using a chlorhexidine scrub or an alcohol-based gel, with hands that were grossly clean but contaminated or with faecal contamination. Bacterial samples were obtained from participants' hands before sanitation, immediately after and then 2 hours later. All samples were cultured on blood and MacConkey agar and bacterial colonies counted after 48 hours. RESULTS: for clean contaminated hands, the percentage reduction in bacterial colonies on blood agar immediately after hand sanitation was similar for both protocols (p=0.3), but was greater for the alcohol gel than chlorhexidine after 2 hours (p=0.005). For hands with faecal contamination, the percentage reduction in bacterial colonies on blood agar was similar for both protocols immediately and 2 hours after sanitation (p>0.2), but positive cultures were obtained on blood agar from samples collected after both protocols, for almost all participants. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate equivalent efficacy of the alcohol-based gel and the pre-surgical chlorhexidine protocol. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The alcohol-based gel protocol is an effective hand asepsis technique for grossly clean contaminated hands and those following faecal contamination, with comparable efficacy to chlorhexidine based scrub.

Evaluation of performance of veterinary in-clinic hematology analyzers.

BACKGROUND: A previous study provided information regarding the quality of in-clinic veterinary biochemistry testing. However, no similar studies for in-clinic veterinary hematology testing have been conducted. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the quality of hematology testing in veterinary in-clinic laboratories using results obtained from testing 3 levels of canine EDTA blood samples. METHODS: Clinicians prepared blood samples to achieve measurand concentrations within, below, and above their RIs and evaluated the samples in triplicate using their in-clinic analyzers. Quality was assessed by comparison of calculated total error with quality requirements, determination of sigma metrics, use of a quality goal index, and agreement between in-clinic and reference laboratory instruments. Suitability for statistical quality control was determined using adaptations from the computerized program, EZRules3. RESULTS: Evaluation of 10 veterinary in-clinic hematology analyzers showed that these instruments often fail to meet quality requirements. At least 60% of analyzers reasonably determined RBC, WBC, HCT, and HGB, when assessed by most quality goal criteria; platelets were less reliably measured, with 80% deemed suitable for low platelet counts, but only 30% for high platelet counts, and automated differential leukocyte counts were generally considered unsuitable for clinical use with fewer than 40% of analyzers meeting the least stringent quality goal requirements. Fewer than 50% of analyzers were able to meet requirements for statistical quality control for any measurand. CONCLUSION: These findings reflect the current status of in-clinic hematology analyzer performance and provide a basis for future evaluations of the quality of veterinary laboratory testing.

Preparing the Small Animal Hospital for Avian and Exotic Animal Emergencies.

Small animal veterinary hospitals will have exotic animal emergencies. Preparing the hospital space, equipment, and staff will provide optimal exotic animal emergency medicine and care. A well-gathered history can be more valuable in exotic pet medicine than most diagnostics. A gentle, well-planned approach, combined with common sense and focused observational skills, is necessary for avian and exotic patients.